Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yanki Erel vs Gilad Tamar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Erel vs Tamar analysis and find out who is favored!
Yanki Erel vs Gilad Tamar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Erel has won 50.31% of points on his second serve, while Tamar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Erel, in recent form, has won 55.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.43% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Erel has saved 56.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Erel has won 61.19% of matches played (W/L 41/ 26), with Tamar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Erel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 25/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Tamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Erel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14), where as Tamar has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Erel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Erel winning 2 and Tamar winning 0. The last match between Erel and Tamar was at the M25 Netanya, 25-05-2022, First, Hard with Yanki Erel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Erel and Tamar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Erel winning 0 times and Tamar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Erel winning 0, and Tamar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Erel has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.4 while Tamar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Erel has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Erel has converted 42.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Erel 1 - 0 Tamar
402
Rank
325
High
23
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
60% (160-106)
Career Total W/L
48% (62-68)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yanki Erel | Gilad Tamar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:0 | 0:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 85% (33/39) | 56% (25/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (26/33) | 52% (13/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (4/6) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (26/45) | 23% (9/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Yanki Erel
Player
Gilad Tamar
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yanki Erel | Gilad Tamar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (34/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (302/265) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 245.88 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1059/1712) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (738/1059) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (327/653) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (72/178) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (709/1746) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Yanki Erel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Altug Celikbilek
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Fajing Sun
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Yanki Erel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Uisung Park
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yanki Erel
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Mikalai Haliak
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Jie Cui
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Yanki Erel
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gilad Tamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Gilad Tamar
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Ori Baron
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Eduardo Cohen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Gilad Tamar
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jannik Rother
Player
Gilad Tamar
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Erel Vs Tamar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yanki Erel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
